2011 stood out as a year when government and business organizations explored their shared goals on sustainability and realized that public-private partnerships and collaborative initiatives are frequently the most effective way to foster sustainable development. Many of these joint efforts will start to bear fruit in 2012.

One example: The launch of the Better Buildings Challenge in December. The public-private partnership component of President Obama’s Better Buildings Initiative, the Challenge is designed to spur private-sector investment in energy efficiency to reduce the cost of energy to business by $40 billion annually and create some 300,000 jobs. Sixty leading companies and non-government organizations have pledged to improve energy efficiency by 20 percent in buildings totaling 1.5 billion square feet, at a collective cost of $2 billion, matched by a $2 billion retrofit financing commitment by the federal government. Jones Lang LaSalle joined the Challenge with a commitment to work with owners on improvements at buildings totaling 98 million square feet over the next eight years.

The Challenge illustrates the alignment between business and government goals in seeking energy and carbon reduction. The White House describes its private-sector partners as organizations “committed to supporting innovative ideas with action, sharing their successes, and creating solutions for others to follow.”

Finding those solutions requires cooperation; for example, groups ranging from the World Economic Forum to Greenprint Foundation have called for changes to loan underwriting guidelines set by governmental bodies to facilitate financing of energy retrofits. More directly, U.S. states have found they can increase renewable energy installations at buildings by offering incentives that would make solar power cost-effective for owners within a relatively short period.

We serve government and business entities, and it’s clear that there is tremendous untapped synergy between the two groups in achieving energy and sustainability goals, particularly in the area of public-private partnerships. As just one of many examples, airports and other government entities often have surplus land that’s not suitable for development but could be leased to private companies for development as large solar energy installations.

Ultimately, government and business have a common cause in improving energy efficiency to reduce cost and carbon emissions while also spurring capital investment in properties and creating jobs. And, the two sides need help from each other to make progress on those goals.

JLL Peter Belisle solar power and roof replacement

Peter Belisle of Jones Lang LaSalle discusses the impact of rooftop age and condition in considering solar power installations. E.g., an owner facing roof replacement might defray the cost by leasing rooftop space to a third-party solar power company.

San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee signed legislation last week requiring energy efficiency audits in commercial buildings every three years. Owners will be required to make improvements, including those requiring capital expenditures, that auditors determine to have a simple payback of five years or less. The law also mandates regular retro-commissioning and public disclosure of ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager ratings.

New York City passed a similar law about a year ago over the objections of owners, who are understandably concerned about financial decisions being placed in the hands of outsiders. There is currently no universal standard for determining costs and payback of the dozens of possible energy measures, so an owner’s fate may depend on the perspective of the professional who conducts the audit.

There are a couple of ways around the audit requirement for owners who have planned ahead. Both the San Francisco and New York energy audit laws excuse buildings that have gained ENERGY STAR labels in multiple years, as well as LEED EB certified buildings in good standing. (Financial hardship is another way to get a pass.)

It wasn’t hard to see this legislative trend coming. The San Francisco law was under discussion for at least a year, and the state of California, along with several other states and cities, previously passed rules mandating energy performance measurement and disclosure. This is one reason our firm insists on ENERGY STAR participation at every property we manage for investors. Enrolling in Portfolio Manager doesn’t guarantee a label, but we’ve found that ratings continue to rise the longer a building participates in the program.

A three- or four-year head start on ENERGY STAR is going to help some buildings in San Francisco and New York avoid energy audits and the mandated capital improvements that follow. How much longer before these mandates come to your city?

2010 was a big year for solar power in the U.S. And thanks in part to two recent federal legislative actions, 2011 is shaping up as an even bigger year.

One of those legislative actions was part of the tax deal that famously extended Bush-era tax credits and unemployment benefits. Embedded in the bill was a provision allowing companies to depreciate 100 percent of the cost of renewable energy in the first year.

Congress also extended Section 1603 of ARRA for another year, which means property owners can continue to get a 30 percent Treasury Grant for solar installations. The 30 percent was originally designed to be a tax credit, but was switched to a grant since many businesses are not profitable enough to use the credits.

There are some great state incentive programs as well, particularly in New Jersey and Maryland, which require utilities to get a percentage of their power from renewable sources generated by private-sector firms. Right now, a commercial property owner in the right area can make a tidy profit from a solar program that’s implemented properly.

Incentives have played a big role in the growth of solar in the U.S. Nationwide solar capacity doubled in 2010 and broke the 1 gigawatt mark for the first time, according The Solar Energy Industries Association. The cost of solar fell 8.5 percent in just six months, fueling demand but also as a result of increasing demand. SEIA predicts the market will double again in 2011, and we will end the year with about 2 gigawatts of capacity.

All these government programs have the same catch – you have to act fast. In the case of state utility programs, the need for speed is simple supply-and-demand economics: Utilities are willing to lock in agreements at high rates now because their requirements exceed local renewable energy capacity. When enough owners catch up with solar installations in a couple of years, market balance will be restored.

The federal programs require fast action simply because they’re short-term incentives, designed to stimulate jobs and investment as well as to generate clean energy. The wind and solar industries employ nearly 200,000 Americans between them, and solar alone added an estimated $18 billion to the U.S. economy, including exports. The government wants to accelerate that.

But most owners aren’t ready to make a quick decision on renewable energy. There are several different ways to structure a deal, and many of the people knocking on owners’ doors are pitching their solution as the one that works best. Faced with conflicting information and a “buy-now” sense of urgency akin to late-night infomercials, owners will tend to do nothing rather than risk falling for a snake-oil sales pitch. That’s understandable, but unfortunate. There really is a great opportunity hidden in all the hype.

LEED Certification and the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) have been discussed lately, with an attempt to discredit the USGBC and the effect certification has on reducing energy consumption. USGBC is concerned about many things from sustainable purchases, to the indoor and outdoor environment to energy conservation. Comparisons to EPA’s Energy Star were made but Energy Star is a completely different tool. Energy Star provides you with a snap shot of how your building is performing compared to other buildings across the nation. Though EPA has been making great strides, this tool has many flaws, including how it calculates source and site energy to how it determines the score. Energy Star vs. LEED Certification is not a true “apples to apples” comparison.

Obtaining LEED certification for your building is an incredible achievement. As a member of the REBNY Board of Directors and Sustainability Committee, we are presently reviewing the next revisions to LEED which are coming out shortly. One major suggestion I have is that consultants should not be allowed to assist with the certification, and only those directly responsible for managing the property should be allowed to compile and enter data. Though the templates require assistance, many hire consultants who do the work and then state the Property Manager is the declarant. Having experienced this effort as a consultant, you learn so much about the functionality of your building. And this is thanks to LEED and the USGBC. Certification should not be an achievement that becomes a source of revenue for those who know very little about your building but understand the loopholes that may be present within the ratings systems and know how to exploit such.

Another recommendation would be to have two sets of rating systems, one for properties that are within an urban environment and those in a suburban setting. Furthermore, those buildings which are multi-tenanted should have an exemption or a means of having a level playing field against those buildings which are owner occupied and whose corporate culture promotes sustainability and whose occupants are willing to participate in many of the credits which require tenant surveys versus multi tenanted buildings and whose tenants may or may not be interested in participating in surveys.

What are your thoughts?

Jack Terranova, PE, LEED AP
Senior Vice President
Cassidy Turley, New York

 

This month, I’m excited to share with you the news that the U.S. Green Building Council’s new Washington, D.C., headquarters office has been certified LEED Platinum under the new version of LEED for Commercial Interiors, becoming the first LEED-certified project under a LEED 2009 rating system. 

This past March, USGBC moved into our new office space, but our journey here has been interesting. When I started with the organization in 2003, we were located in a mid-block Class B building in downtown D.C., where we eventually expanded into three separate office suites totaling 11,000 square feet of space. After many years in that space, we had outgrown it, so we built out 25,000 square feet in a LEED Gold building a few blocks away that had undergone a gut rehab the year before USGBC’s occupancy. Our build-out earned Platinum certification under LEED for Commercial Interiors, and we stayed there for two-and-a-half years.  

But the explosive growth of the green building industry led to a similarly dramatic expansion of USGBC’s staff, and in 2008 we recognized that we once again needed a new workspace. As the organization that brings together the world’s leaders in green building science and technology, we recognized our responsibility to have a headquarters that is on the leading edge of innovation and performance. It needed to exemplify LEED and set the bar at new heights. Using the newest version of LEED pushed our new space to achieve the very best building science and technology currently has to offer. The result – a workspace that earned 94 of the 110 possible LEED points, 14 more than the 80 required for Platinum certification – reflects a transforming building market and serves as a living lab, teaching visitors and employees alike the ways that green building is better for occupants, better for business, better for the community and better for the planet.

The new office, located at 2101 L Street in the west end of the downtown D.C. business district, is a shining example of green design.  Our interior suite is located within a Class A building that is owned and managed by Vornado/Charles E. Smith. It was originally built in 1975 and underwent a significant refurbishment that was completed in November 2007. From the onset, it was critical that USGBC find a building and landlord who aligned with our goals and our organizational mission. We’ve always believed that the best results in green design occur when green is worked into the process as early as possible, and our brokerage team from CB Richard Ellis put this into action with a 20-point environmental assessment as part of the RFP process, helping us evaluate buildings not only by location and rental rate, but also by overall environmental performance. As in any real estate decision, a number of factors influenced the ultimate decision, but the lease provisions – like being able to submeter energy use and pay directly – helped considerably by allowing USGBC to benefit directly from the operating savings of smart design decisions.

Vornado/Charles E. Smith has also committed to LEED certification of the ongoing operations of the existing building.  The building already meets all prerequisites such as baseline indoor air quality performance. The landlord also uses green cleaning practices, purchases renewable energy certificates for 50 percent of the building’s energy consumption and provides bicycle storage for tenants.

The interior space itself was designed to be sophisticated, timeless, flexible and simple. The design team  comprised of Envision Design, GHT Limited and James G. Davis Construction designed  and built an open floorplan that leverages the daylighting opportunity provided by a floor-to-ceiling glass curtain wall on the south and east facades of the building. Low workstations and glass-enclosed interior offices provide exterior views for 97 percent of occupants, and a corridor of light carpeting lines the exterior corridors of the space, bringing daylight further into the space through reflection off the carpet and white furniture. The daylight harvesting in the space allows for a drastic reduction in artificial lighting needs, and the Convia lighting system provides not only very specific adjustments in lighting level based on need but also provides detailed measurement and a dashboard to track ongoing performance. Overall, 62 percent of the lighting load is connected to daylight-responsive controls. As designed, the lighting systems and controls put the space at 54 percent below lighting power allowance, according to ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007.

Many other strategies were utilized to achieve Platinum certification. Over 95 percent of construction waste was diverted from the landfill, and overall water use was reduced by 40 percent with Sloan waterless urinals and dual-flush toilets in the restrooms and high-efficiency Bosch appliances in the kitchen. Furniture systems, ceiling tiles, flooring and other materials were selected for their high recycled content, location of manufacturing to reduce transportation impacts, and impact on indoor air quality. Products from USGBC member companies such as Haworth, Knoll, Mohawk and Armstrong showcase how far manufacturers have gotten in greening their products.

The new USGBC headquarters has been a magnificent new home for our growing organization. The project team created a workspace that capitalizes on our employees’ enthusiasm, fostering a healthy, productive, collaborative working environment. When we come into work, we don’t feel stifled by the office – we feel empowered by it. The flexibility in the space will allow for continued growth and, once again, we are able to showcase our offices as exemplary of everything a LEED building is: high-performing, resource-efficient, healthy and productive.  Tours of the space are available upon request; e-mail hqtours@usgbc.org for more information.

   

Attending the TED conference is always inspiring, entertaining, and energizing , and given the wide range of presenters, it is a great forum to gather ideas from leading edge researchers, writers and experts in the latest developments in science, technology, entertainment and design.  The TED organization is committed to bringing these talks to the world, as they continue to be posted on the TED website.

  

 

This past week at Oxford was a particularly diverse range of speakers as well as attendees.  With 50 talks over 3 ½ days, it seems the best way to try to absorb all the learning is to seek common threads and themes, along with considering highlights. 

 

 

Oxford Museum of Natural History - TEDGlobal Conference

From the first day, with the surprise

talk by Prime Minister Gordon Brown on shared global ethics – and the over-riding theme of environmental and social pressures on the planet, the possibilities for great human achievement presented across all disciplines were powerful.

 

  

 

Globalization of culture and communication, climate change, technology integration, bio-mimicry, medical and science breakthroughs, and the financial market pressures have created an unprecedented time for innovation in all market sectors. Of the 700 attendees, I met industry leaders from India, Japan, Cairo, Brazil, UK, South Africa, Hong Kong, Europe, and the US, among others – all seeking new ways of leading their businesses into the future.

 

 

For me, a few highlights were Bertrand Piccard, unveiling his new solar only powered aircraft slated to fly around the globe next summer (including through the night); Cameron Sinclair from Architecture for Humanity on construction sites around the world; Daniel Pink on the science of motivation (due out with his new book), and of course the session on city-building. We are now working with new sustainable design practices, new tools and technologies that allow us to create better cities – both in the developing world, as well as improving the cities we live in.

 

 

While caution and potential risks were debated, prevailing optimism and hope for humanity and the planet was the ultimate take away from TEDGlobal.  I’m thinking about all of this today as we develop the design of a residential and commercial center for 30,000 people in China. We have unprecedented opportunity and powerful responsibility to enhance the lives of the people and their community. 

With the launch of LEED for Retail just around the corner, I took the opportunity while in Chicago on other business to see for myself how restaurants are integrating green design into their facilities. This is interesting on several levels, both because restaurants are very energy intensive, and because the greening of design through major restaurant brands poses the opportunity to reach communities and consumers in a new and unique way.

In some ways, green building has been an urban phenomenon, with advocates talking about how office buildings must be green if they still want to be considered Class A space, or about how the greenest buildings are those that are infill developments of existing dense urban areas. While these are all true, a large part of America lives and works in suburban or rural areas, places where the largest buildings around are big box retail and communities are heavily dependent on automobiles. These communities can still benefit from green design, and can be part of the solution to many of our economic and energy challenges.  The Chicago area is unique in that there are many restaurant projects that have registered or are LEED certified.  I traveled to the South Side of Chicago, still within sight of the Sears Tower (which is undergoing its own greening initiative), and passed the empty parking lot of a flea market and pulled into the permeable parking lot of the first LEED Gold certified McDonald’s. This McDonald’s is company owned and operated and serves as somewhat of a testing ground for the green design attributes that they may incorporate into other new restaurants in their franchisee network. The restaurant incorporates many energy efficiency strategies, including skylights, LED interior lighting, heat recovery from the refrigeration units and even LED lights in the parking lot, which will not only save energy but save maintenance costs due to their long life. Additionally, the McDonald’s also incorporated a green roof, low-flow water fixtures, and worked with their décor providers to increase the recycled content of the restaurant seating area materials. Educational signs and a video help educate customers about the green features located throughout the space.

My next stop was a registered Denny’s Restaurant project located just outside the city of Joliet. The greening of this restaurant was led by the local franchisee and restaurateur rather than by the corporate design team, and was built within a standard budget. Located in the end-cap of a small strip center, the Denny’s makes tremendous use of natural daylight, including six large locally made skylights and extensive lighting sensors and controls. The remaining lighting consists of LEDs and high efficiency fluorescents. 

The greening of this restaurant started long before design as the restaurateur sought to find a suitable building and amenable landlord. This location worked out perfectly as the landlord was able to accommodate the request for extra insulation in the foundation and a highly reflective roof to help mitigate heating and cooling costs. Perhaps most importantly, every diner at Denny’s has a way to connect with the green attributes of the restaurant, including a brochure at each table and informative signage on the walls. With 5,000 people served weekly, the opportunity for this one restaurant to educate consumers is significant.

I would have liked to have visited the LEED Platinum Chipotle north of Chicago in Gurnee Mills, IL or the new Pizza Fusion in Naperville, IL, but unfortunately, my time was limited. I’m looking forward to visiting more green restaurants throughout the country which will surely take shape after the LEED for Retail rating system is launch in the fall.

   

Kate Diamond, AIA, LEED AP, spoke with me this morning about whole building audits. Developers, building owners and occupants are all in a position to benefit from a holistic building audit. The whole building approach to energy usage and air quality optimizes assets and minimizes costs. In existing buildings, the assessment identifies where most energy is wasted, and allows building owners and tenants to develop alternatives and phased plans for optimization.  

Kyoto - bamboo forest

Humans thrive on exposure to daylight, views, and clean air. Strategies can be as simple as the use of low VOC paints on all renovations, to placing high walls perpendicular to windows, and lower walls parallel – adding daylight deeper into the building floorplate. I spent the morning in this west facing conference room, and noticed as the meeting adjourned that the light sensors had kept the lights off the entire time (daylight was more than adequate, and very pleasant), and I was inhaling the scent of rain on bamboo leaves in the alley below through the open windows.   

  

Kyoto - palace garden pavillion

Balancing strategies can be unexpected – like the 2 foot ceiling to floor height achieved here by use of the interstitial floor space as a plenum, eliminating ductwork and the building height associated with it (typically 4 feet) – a significant reduction in building height, along with increased daylight due to open clear ceilings. Other strategies may be expected – updating lighting (reducing energy consumption) while capturing utility incentives and tax credits, or balancing the cost of an exterior skin modifications against savings in air conditioning and lighting loads. 

NBBJ - Seattle, photography Benjamin Benschneider

Understanding the competition and their green lease offerings is also a tool in the development of optimization strategies. Understanding tenant behavior impacts and the demands for quality of light and air is critical, and will add pressure to this competitive marketplace.

Change Design – our pursuit of the moment.  In developing and designing buildings —  the act of creating buildings, by its nature, is a great expense of energy and materials dedicated to a moment in time, for the human activity of it’s time.

Change is a constant state — how can we create buildings that are relevant today, and lead us into our changed future?  Between the economy, climate change, and the technology revolution, we must design for change.  Here are some of the change design tools that we are using, every day.

Understand the past, listen to the present, design for the future. True listening involves challenging and dropping assumptions that are no longer relevant – and gaining new insights

photography - Sean Airhart

Find the essential human experience necessary for an organization to optimise and be better. Look deeper, put yourself inside and walk through the experience, every step of the way.

Build renaissance teams – integrating diverse intelligence creates high performance outcomes. Pull in team members from differing backgrounds and with varied knowledge and training - don’t allow social cohesion to stifle creative thinking.

Design to reuse, adapt, and re-invent. Look beyond the horizon line, understand directional shifts – step outside, broaden your vision. Consider all scales – the site, the neighborhood, the city, state, country – and look to the world beyond,

Design to cross boundaries – drive for integration, inside out, outside in. individual, community, world.

We can all be artists of change, shaping our future through change design.

© 2012 CPE Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Yardi  |   Point2  |   Multihousing News  |   Commercial Property Executive  |   RENTCafe  |   YES Energy Management  |   PropertyShark  |   RentGrow  |   Visual Homes  |   SiteStuff  |   Point2 Property Manager  |   ScreeningWorks  |   ResidentShield