sSilverman

With the many security challenges that face the internet today, numerous companies have adopted a “Cloud” infrastructure utilizing different SaaS (Software as a Service) technologies.  In the commercial real estate industry sensitive information is being passed via the internet daily including accounting and tenant information.  A common misperception about the “Cloud” is that a company no longer has control over their network and is therefore more susceptible to security risks.
Put those ideas to rest!  Because now more than ever our information is secure and protected.  To ease your suspicions, I have broken down these successful security technologies used by companies:
Access Management:  Who will access your applications?  This is a security policy to control all your web enabled platforms.  This is important in real estate as competitors and certain individuals should not be granted access to certain data.  Without a username and password these people will not gain access.
Auditing and Logging:  Now that you have a set list of users with specific access levels you can audit and log their usage. This will provide a measure of accountability in case something goes wrong or goes missing.  These capabilities are also useful for compliance standards.
Central De-Provisioning:  The advent of companies specializing in Cloud Security allows for easy integration of your existing applications. This leads to ease of provisioning or de provisioning.  The benefit is that you will not have to take an application to application approach when adding or removing users and therefore reducing the chance of mistakes.
Single Sign On:  This is the end user benefit for integration.  With centralized management it is possible to utilize one username and password for all your enabled applications.  This keeps your network organized and more secure as you can govern access and credentials in one place.
At RDM, we have 3 Cloud based applications that employ the security strategies mentioned above. Utilizing such technologies will insure that your real estate information will remain secure and protected in the “Cloud.”

To find out more about RDM’s Cloud applications, visit our website or contact (212) 213-8190. And be sure to visit our blog.

Peter Boritz is a principal at Real Data Management.

The USC Lusk Center’s Richard Green blogs about the intricacies of real estate investment in India and China.

The USC Lusk Center’s Richard Green blogs about what global real estate investors are looking for in the countries where they choose to invest.

Peter Boritz of Real Data Management offers a video briefing on the latest real estate-friendly apps for tablets, especially iPads.

 

By James DuMars

As the commercial mortgage banking market has been discussing for the last few months, CMBS as a debt vehicle is essential to the functioning of our real estate capital markets. However, it is important to grasp how vastly different CMBS is from a portfolio loan at a life insurance company. When it comes to the choice between the calm life company environment and CMBS, there is just no comparison. For example, during the period when spreads were blowing out, one of my clients locked rate on a 50% LTV for a grocery anchored retail center with a life company.
We simply got on the phone together and locked the rate at 4.80% fixed for 10 years. The life company didn’t pursue the loan so they could sell it. They see the loan as an investment to cover a promised return they owe to a policy holder. The trade-off for the borrower was to put an additional 10-15% cash down to buy the deal and lock in an extremely low rate and simplified execution. In this instance, the customer saw the value and had the means to invest the extra cash and settle for less leverage and a 25-year amortization versus 30. We had other life companies sandwiched between the CMBS loan quotes and the winning life company quote, but they wanted to get paid for offering the additional dollars. For example, their rates were closer to 5.25% – 5.40%.

Manage Your Expectations
If a life company can’t hit the dollars and amortization you need, a CMBS loan may be your best option. However, expect a choppy, uncertain experience and make sure and grasp that the process has changed since 2007. These changes include lender legal fees running at least $25,000, as all the loan documents have been modified “to restore confidence.” Other changes include some CMBS lenders outsourcing the underwriting and borrowers may get a bill for it. A market auditor will show up and verify that your rents are truly at market. If they aren’t, you’re going to get a haircut. Go into the process with your eyes wide open and full candid disclosure.

Finally, if a mortgage broker calls you and starts the conversation that CMBS is back and a great option before they understand your business model, beware! They probably don’t represent any life insurance companies and CMBS is their only way to survive. Think of a CMBS loan application as a nonbinding letter of intent, with the intent of the CMBS loan originator to sell the loan. If for any reason the market changes and the originator doesn’t believe they will be able to sell the loan for a profit, they will modify the loan to make it saleable or they won’t make the loan.

James DuMars is managing director of NorthMarq Capital’s Phoenix office.

The USC Lusk Center’s Richard Green blogs about the retail sector’s performance: positive trends, areas for concern and what to watch.

With a growing number of high-profile Web sites such as those belonging to Sony, Citibank and even the CIA becoming victims to hacker attacks, there has never been a better time to re-evaluate the passwords you use for your online accounts.

The multi-family side of the GSEs has proven over two decades that it can effectively and profitably execute and close billions of dollars of multi-family rental housing loans. Through that activity, it has stabilized apartment values by providing capital to a broad spectrum of rental housing. One third of American households rent. Those properties are owned by pension funds, REITs and tens of thousands of small business and family partnerships of every form, in every community in this country. A critical component of every apartment investment is consistently available fixed-rate mortgages.

 The GSEs have continued to perform profitably the core business of providing long-term fixed-rate mortgage capital to the apartment market, through recessions and the single-family boom and bust.

News Flash Number One: To those that are responsible for deciding the future of the GSEs, it wasn’t the corporate structure that created this excellent, well-operated business line within Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, it was the people who were there every day, operating this business and making underwriting decisions. And not only were they making solid decisions but executing them in a timely manner that resulted in transactions being closed in 60 to 90 days as a normal course of business.

The exceptional people that have managed that business have never received the credit due to them.  Unfortunately, through the inaction and missteps–and in some cases careless negligence–of regulators and politicians, the multi-family businesses of the GSEs are on a path that, if not corrected soon, will lead to their effective demise. Key employees at both Freddie and Fannie continue to resign as they reach the limit of their patience. This talent drain will result in the GSEs’ inability to operate to the high standards they have historically adhered.

Both firms have lost regional managers, credit officers, production managers and most recently the head of Freddie Mac Multi-family, Mike May. It’s not too late to stop this loss of talent. The responsibility falls on regulators and politicians to take action now. Certainty of employment is an absolute necessity. Good people want to know where their company is headed; they want to be associated with success and receive the recognition and compensation that is fairly due to them. Not only have they not received the recognition due to them, they have been broadly painted with the failures of the single-family business.

News Flash Number Two: There is no foolproof structure. It’s all about good people. People that are self-absorbed with their own personal greed and agenda for power and money will game any system for their own benefit. Those people are not interested in the long-term success of the enterprise; they are only interested in themselves. That perspective is unfortunately common in many poorly run businesses. Said another way, it’s always about the people! Good people that have the right values will make any enterprise with a fundamentally sound concept successful.

 Have you ever wondered why Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have less than a 1 percent multi-family rental delinquency rate and the commercial mortgage-backed securities market has a 15.7 percent delinquency rate on the same property type? It’s about people making the right long-term decisions– consistently.

It’s not too late to fix this. There are still enough good people at both firms to operate as successfully as they have in the past, and given the opportunity, they are capable of supplementing their bench talent with the right type of additional new hires. But the talent pool is shrinking fast as GSE employees continue to resign, and both firms are at a major disadvantage in hiring key people.

The time to act is now; doing nothing will effectively result in the demise of these critical businesses. The potential financial impact to rental housing and the economy cannot be understated. The private sector does not have the capacity to replace the $324 billion portfolio of fixed-rate mortgage capital for multi-family rental properties held or sponsored by the GSEs and related agencies. Segregate the GSE multi-family business from single-family and put in place the assurances and guidance necessary for this business to survive before it’s too late.

Eduardo “Ed” Padilla is CEO of NorthMarq Capital.

(For more on the GSEs, click here for Shekar Narasimhan’s views.)

 

Shekar Narasimhan offers his thoughts on how the GSEs benefit the rental housing market, whether privatization is a viable alternative and the risks of not finding a solution quickly. Click on the link for his thoughts. And then weigh in with your own thoughts!

Multifamily First

The USC Lusk Center’s Richard Green blogs about how the property sectors are performing.

© 2012 CPE Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Yardi  |   Point2  |   Multihousing News  |   Commercial Property Executive  |   RENTCafe  |   YES Energy Management  |   PropertyShark  |   RentGrow  |   Visual Homes  |   SiteStuff  |   Point2 Property Manager  |   ScreeningWorks  |   ResidentShield