Dan Probst

Dan Probst Chairman, Energy and Sustainability Services Jones Lang LaSalle As Chairman of Energy and Sustainability Services at Jones Lang LaSalle, Dan Probst oversees more than 120 professionals who conduct project management, energy management, solar power solutions, corporate consulting and facility management to improve energy and sustainability at client sites worldwide. He is a founding and current member of Jones Lang LaSalle’s Global Environmental Sustainability Board. He also oversees the firm’s Engineering & Operations team across the Americas region. He has a Mechanical Engineering degree from Purdue University and an MBA from Indiana University, is a registered Professional Engineer and LEED Accredited Professional. Jones Lang LaSalle has helped clients save more than $300 million in energy costs in over the past three years, and has guided the LEED certification of more than 200 new and existing properties and commercial interiors. Jones Lang LaSalle is a financial and professional services firm specializing in real estate. The firm offers integrated services delivered by expert teams worldwide to clients seeking increased value by owning, occupying or investing in real estate. Jones Lang LaSalle serves clients in 60 countries from 750 locations worldwide, including 180 corporate offices. The firm is an industry leader in property and corporate facility management services, with a portfolio of approximately 1.6 billion square feet worldwide.

2011 stood out as a year when government and business organizations explored their shared goals on sustainability and realized that public-private partnerships and collaborative initiatives are frequently the most effective way to foster sustainable development. Many of these joint efforts will start to bear fruit in 2012.

One example: The launch of the Better Buildings Challenge in December. The public-private partnership component of President Obama’s Better Buildings Initiative, the Challenge is designed to spur private-sector investment in energy efficiency to reduce the cost of energy to business by $40 billion annually and create some 300,000 jobs. Sixty leading companies and non-government organizations have pledged to improve energy efficiency by 20 percent in buildings totaling 1.5 billion square feet, at a collective cost of $2 billion, matched by a $2 billion retrofit financing commitment by the federal government. Jones Lang LaSalle joined the Challenge with a commitment to work with owners on improvements at buildings totaling 98 million square feet over the next eight years.

The Challenge illustrates the alignment between business and government goals in seeking energy and carbon reduction. The White House describes its private-sector partners as organizations “committed to supporting innovative ideas with action, sharing their successes, and creating solutions for others to follow.”

Finding those solutions requires cooperation; for example, groups ranging from the World Economic Forum to Greenprint Foundation have called for changes to loan underwriting guidelines set by governmental bodies to facilitate financing of energy retrofits. More directly, U.S. states have found they can increase renewable energy installations at buildings by offering incentives that would make solar power cost-effective for owners within a relatively short period.

We serve government and business entities, and it’s clear that there is tremendous untapped synergy between the two groups in achieving energy and sustainability goals, particularly in the area of public-private partnerships. As just one of many examples, airports and other government entities often have surplus land that’s not suitable for development but could be leased to private companies for development as large solar energy installations.

Ultimately, government and business have a common cause in improving energy efficiency to reduce cost and carbon emissions while also spurring capital investment in properties and creating jobs. And, the two sides need help from each other to make progress on those goals.

JLL Peter Belisle solar power and roof replacement

Peter Belisle of Jones Lang LaSalle discusses the impact of rooftop age and condition in considering solar power installations. E.g., an owner facing roof replacement might defray the cost by leasing rooftop space to a third-party solar power company.

San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee signed legislation last week requiring energy efficiency audits in commercial buildings every three years. Owners will be required to make improvements, including those requiring capital expenditures, that auditors determine to have a simple payback of five years or less. The law also mandates regular retro-commissioning and public disclosure of ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager ratings.

New York City passed a similar law about a year ago over the objections of owners, who are understandably concerned about financial decisions being placed in the hands of outsiders. There is currently no universal standard for determining costs and payback of the dozens of possible energy measures, so an owner’s fate may depend on the perspective of the professional who conducts the audit.

There are a couple of ways around the audit requirement for owners who have planned ahead. Both the San Francisco and New York energy audit laws excuse buildings that have gained ENERGY STAR labels in multiple years, as well as LEED EB certified buildings in good standing. (Financial hardship is another way to get a pass.)

It wasn’t hard to see this legislative trend coming. The San Francisco law was under discussion for at least a year, and the state of California, along with several other states and cities, previously passed rules mandating energy performance measurement and disclosure. This is one reason our firm insists on ENERGY STAR participation at every property we manage for investors. Enrolling in Portfolio Manager doesn’t guarantee a label, but we’ve found that ratings continue to rise the longer a building participates in the program.

A three- or four-year head start on ENERGY STAR is going to help some buildings in San Francisco and New York avoid energy audits and the mandated capital improvements that follow. How much longer before these mandates come to your city?

2010 was a big year for solar power in the U.S. And thanks in part to two recent federal legislative actions, 2011 is shaping up as an even bigger year.

One of those legislative actions was part of the tax deal that famously extended Bush-era tax credits and unemployment benefits. Embedded in the bill was a provision allowing companies to depreciate 100 percent of the cost of renewable energy in the first year.

Congress also extended Section 1603 of ARRA for another year, which means property owners can continue to get a 30 percent Treasury Grant for solar installations. The 30 percent was originally designed to be a tax credit, but was switched to a grant since many businesses are not profitable enough to use the credits.

There are some great state incentive programs as well, particularly in New Jersey and Maryland, which require utilities to get a percentage of their power from renewable sources generated by private-sector firms. Right now, a commercial property owner in the right area can make a tidy profit from a solar program that’s implemented properly.

Incentives have played a big role in the growth of solar in the U.S. Nationwide solar capacity doubled in 2010 and broke the 1 gigawatt mark for the first time, according The Solar Energy Industries Association. The cost of solar fell 8.5 percent in just six months, fueling demand but also as a result of increasing demand. SEIA predicts the market will double again in 2011, and we will end the year with about 2 gigawatts of capacity.

All these government programs have the same catch – you have to act fast. In the case of state utility programs, the need for speed is simple supply-and-demand economics: Utilities are willing to lock in agreements at high rates now because their requirements exceed local renewable energy capacity. When enough owners catch up with solar installations in a couple of years, market balance will be restored.

The federal programs require fast action simply because they’re short-term incentives, designed to stimulate jobs and investment as well as to generate clean energy. The wind and solar industries employ nearly 200,000 Americans between them, and solar alone added an estimated $18 billion to the U.S. economy, including exports. The government wants to accelerate that.

But most owners aren’t ready to make a quick decision on renewable energy. There are several different ways to structure a deal, and many of the people knocking on owners’ doors are pitching their solution as the one that works best. Faced with conflicting information and a “buy-now” sense of urgency akin to late-night infomercials, owners will tend to do nothing rather than risk falling for a snake-oil sales pitch. That’s understandable, but unfortunate. There really is a great opportunity hidden in all the hype.

© 2012 CPE Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Yardi  |   Point2  |   Multihousing News  |   Commercial Property Executive  |   RENTCafe  |   YES Energy Management  |   PropertyShark  |   RentGrow  |   Visual Homes  |   SiteStuff  |   Point2 Property Manager  |   ScreeningWorks  |   ResidentShield