jdumars

James DuMars

With all the talk of increased allocations by lenders at the conference, it seems like the credit crisis is fading into the abyss as lenders speak of anticipating extreme competition this year to get their money out.  This year the conference was held in San Diego and representatives from 25 CMBS platforms, 50 life insurance companies, agencies, FHA and various bridge, mezzanine lenders and hedge funds attended.  NorthMarq ran two suites and had meetings on the half hour with each lender.  We also hosted a cocktail party for 150 lender representatives.  The overwhelming message was “we have money, lots of it and we want to get it out.”  Nearly every life insurance company reported an increased allocation for mortgages.  

Sentiment
The cocktail parties were all full, lots of smiling faces and several life company lenders seeking trophy deals and offering a 150-spread to capture them.  However, because of renewed competition on the immediate horizon, other life co. lenders spoke of creativity, smaller loans, flex prepay etc.  One lender spoke about how they dropped their spreads 25-basis points that afternoon.  The gist: Everyone accumulated cash for two years and now they need to put it to work.  After three years of the doldrums, it was a refreshing conference, and I believe there’s renewed momentum for a much more competitive lending environment.  Don’t expect a recovery to look like the peak years, but instead a pragmatic environment where lenders will do their best to get their hands around a deal and see if they can make it work.   

Lender Feedback 

  • CMBS – 25 platforms looking for loans.   If I were a borrower, I would consider the platform that is backed by a large low-cost balance sheet and go with a mortgage banker that delivers volume to the platform.  These groups are looking to reestablish credibility and have assigned underwriting teams to NorthMarq since we can deliver the volume.  Be realistic, this is CMBS 2.0.  Expect springing or soft lockboxes, reserves, carve-outs, etc.    Interest Rates – 6.15% – 6.35% (10-Year Term).
  • Life Companies – Some are talking low rate for trophy assets while others are speaking of higher leverage, smaller loan size and listening to the story and in some cases offering structure.    All seem to acknowledge their peers, as well as CMBS platforms, are going to be major competition for them in the very near future.  Interest Rates – 5.25% – 6.35% (10-Year Term).
  • Agencies (Freddie & Fannie) – These two organizations originated over $30 Billion in multifamily loans last year.  Barring meaningful reform, they will continue to dominate the multifamily lending landscape.  They have the government behind their paper which gives them a huge advantage in terms of cost of funds and liquidity.  Interest Rates – 5.20% – 6.10% (10-Year Term).
  • Mezzanine Lenders- Look for these groups to offer gap money to fill the shortfall between the first mortgage and what the borrower needs to either pay off his existing debt or acquire a property.  These groups will lend up to 80-85% loan to value with rates in the 10-15 percent range.  Even a couple life companies mentioned mezzanine or B-notes behind their first as a way to capture business. 
  • Hedge/Opportunity Funds – Seeking experienced sponsors to partner up with.  90/10 Equity ratio and seeking to double their investment in 5 years. Most want cash flowing assets with upside. The minimum investment of these groups is $5MM to $10MM.  
  • Bridge Lenders – These are nonrecourse loans. Rates are in the mid 6% range to 7.25 percent range with terms of 2-3 years, interest only. Offering additional advancements for good news (leasing).
    - Actively seeking opportunities for placing purchase money loans on distressed assets
    - Loan size $10 million and up
    - Will finance vacant buildings
    - Leverage is in the 55%-65 percent range depending on occupancy
    - Focusing on core locations and Class A assets
  • Interest Rates – U.S. Treasury Rates were rising during the entire conference.  At the same time, lenders made it clear they have room in their spreads to compensate for this.  After all, historical mortgage spreads are closer to 150 so even if the U.S. Treasury Yield went to 4.50 percent and spreads compressed to 150 for the run of the mill opportunity we’re still at 6 percent.  Not much anxiety about rising treasury yields.  Today, spreads are in the 225 to 275 range for the average opportunity and drop as low as 150 for the low-leverage trophy opportunity.

Summary
In summary, lots of cash is ready to be loaned and CMBS is back but now known as 2.0, as the programs have been changed to restore confidence in the product. Expect competition to eventually lead to higher loan to values, creativity, and an enlarging of the “box” lenders use to pursue opportunities.  Don’t expect lenders to go back to the market peak behaviors anytime soon.  Furthermore, Dodd-Frank reportedly requires CMBS originators to hold on to a portion of the deal.  All lenders will do more due diligence and will continue to mark rents or blend them to market.  

James DuMars, managing director/senior vice president for NorthMarq Capital’s office in Phoenix, has more than 20 years of experience resolving complex commercial financing issues. Contact James at (602) 508-2206 or jdumars@northmarq.com

By: James DuMars, Phoenix office managing director-NorthMarq Capital

The gloves are off as several life companies lowered their rates below 5% in order to compete for loans against Class A apartment communities and institutional industrial.  We’ve seen rates as low as 4.45% fixed for 10 years for low leverage loan requests on multifamily.  Let me emphasize that these are for large loans against Class A multifamily in solid locations across the US.  

However, the trend of narrowing spreads continues as life companies seek out opportunities to deploy capital on quality assets and multifamily is at the top of many companies’ lists of property types they’re underweight on.  It’s simply supply and demand and capital is piling up at the life companies as the agencies have been the dominant lending force the past couple years in the multifamily space.  The narrowing spread trend has also spilled over to the industrial sector as well for large low leverage loans in healthy markets.  One life company recently quoted 4.75% for a low loan request on an institutional quality industrial project.  This is a positive trend and one could deduce that it will eventually spread to other assets as competition to deploy capital mounts.

James DuMars, managing director/senior vice president for NorthMarq Capital’s office in Phoenix, has more than 20 years of experience resolving complex commercial financing issues. Contact James at (602) 508-2206 or jdumars@northmarq.com

By: James Dumars

We’ve not seen a recovery in the multi-family rental market but values have increased dramatically.  It’s easy to draw the positive correlation between lower interest rates and falling cap rates for multi-family.  

Multifamily owners have a significant advantage over owners of all other types of commercial real estate as they can access government guaranteed debt from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  As I understand it, the investors who buy this debt on the secondary market are rewarded with higher yields than standard US Treasuries but receive the government’s guaranty on the bonds.   Consequently, recent Freddie Mac securitizations have reportedly been very successful as fund managers snap up the paper. �

A case in point: A specific property would have traded for a 6.25% cap rate a year ago.  The property recently went under contract at a 5.25% cap rate, which is approximately 20% more than it would have traded for a year earlier, despite the fact that rents have not increased.  The buyer obtained an agency mortgage with a fixed rate of 4.93% based on today’s closing treasury yield plus a spread of 197 basis points.  The buyer competed with 20+ other investors for the deal and was selected from a best and final of the top three.  The buyer, like many others, recognizes that the replacement cost of the Class A asset is $125,000 per door and he would likely have to go to the outskirts of town to build a similar property.  Buying the asset in the $90k per unit range provides him with upside in value and future rents once the oversupply is eventually absorbed.   He also locks in a very attractive interest rate on a fully assumable mortgage that can be increased in the future through supplemental funding.

I’ve seen this market transition from vulture buyers looking for multifamily to buyers who have raised funds and intend to build a presence in Phoenix.  The vultures have gone quiet as the opportunities they were waiting for have not materialized, thanks to the very competitively priced capital available from the agencies.

James DuMars, managing director/senior vice president for NorthMarq Capital’s office in Phoenix, has more than 20 years of experience resolving complex commercial financing issues. Contact James at (602) 508-2206 or jdumars@northmarq.com

By: James DuMars, managing director-NorthMarq Capital’s Phoenix office

We’re seeing increased activity from several large banks and investment banks as they seek to accumulate loans for their CMBS programs as well as increase “on book” commercial real estate loans.

Just this week, I met with one national bank and learned that they funded approximately $1 Billion in new permanent loans in the past 60 days within their Commercial Mortgage Origination group, bringing their total year-to-date production to $1.6 Billion. Their goal this year is $3 Billion, significantly more than the $700 Million they originated in 2009. Many of these loans are slated for CMBS but if need be, the bank will hold these loans. Their plan is to take a portfolio of $500 Million to market sometime later this year. When asked about the supply of “B Piece” buyers, the bank representative replied that they believe the pool will be fully subscribed but if need be, the bank will hold their “B” piece. They’re confident in their underwriting.

Despite the fact that since 2008 no traditional type CMBS pools have been securitized, this trend to accumulate CMBS structured loans and sell them is consistent with business plans of several national banks and investment banks.

Lenders report their survey of the market tells them there’s no shortage of investors. It’s just difficult to find deals that make sense or borrowers willing or able to borrow, which in some instances involves writing a check to pay down an existing over leveraged property. This imbalance of supply and demand is creating inertia for spread compression and slightly more aggressive lending.  Again, this activity surrounds the perception that the typical CMBS pools of the past can again be profitable for firms even though none have yet to be taken to market.

For example, the recent $309 Million Pool RBS/Natixis securitized wasn’t exactly what we would call a traditional CMBS pool. Reportedly, it was multi-borrower, a total of six loans and most of the loans were nearly simultaneously closed with the securitization of the pool. Rumor has it that some of the loan documents had “flex language” meaning if need be the originator could have the borrower agree to changes to the documents to satisfy the bond buyers. Finally, the securitized portion of the pool was all investment grade rated with a private placement of the mezzanine piece.

Today’s loans range from 70-75% loan to value, 225-240 spreads over 5-or-10 year swaps depending on loan term, which equates to an interest rate of 5% and 6% respectively. Amortizations are typically 30 years with the loans sized to 10% debt yields and 1.35 X debt coverage ratios.

Rents are being marked to market or being blended to market depending on tenant credit. Typically a market vacancy is applied when underwriting or a micro-market vacancy if the asset is uniquely competitive.

James DuMars, managing director/senior vice president of NorthMarq Capital’s office in Phoenix, has more than 20 years of experience resolving complex commercial financing issues. Contact James at (602) 508-2206 or jdumars@northmarq.com

This headline is being broadcast throughout the real estate industry and is stirring up optimism that more liquidity is returning to the marketplace.

The new loans are more conservative and have some nuances reflecting the decrease in risk tolerance of both the originators and the purchasers of the paper. The originator doesn’t want to be stuck with the paper and the purchaser wants to make sure the value or rating of the paper stays intact.

To identify the major differences in the new CMBS loans verses those offered during the credit boom, I’ve summarized a brief comparison below:

Present/Former

 Amortization: Required/Interest Only Common

Loan to Value: 65-70%/80%

DCR: 1.30X/1.20X

Debt Yield: 12%/None

Rate: 6.25%/5%-6%

Lock Box: Required/Negotiable

Warm Body: Required/Negotiable

Pool Size:$500MM/$2BB+

Debt Yield – The term debt yield means dividing net cash flow (the cash flow after reserves for tenant improvements, leasing commissions and reserves) by 12% and you arrive at your maximum loan amount.

Lock Box – if the debt coverage ratio drops below 1.10X then the lender collects your rents directly.

Reviewing the contrasts between the terms offered during the former and present periods it’s logical to see the peak versus trough correlation. Logic indicates as securitizations increase and competition arises for the new CMBS paper that gradually the present platform will evolve to look closer to the former. The question that remains is when?

As more players have entered the market, we have seen firms start hiring again as well as a break in pricing. From early 2010 to today we’ve seen CMBS rates drop from 7% to 6.25%. That’s good news for the capital markets and reflects a trend that demand exists for the paper.

If you’re contemplating a CMBS loan, go in with realistic expectations including the “present” terms outlined above, expecting the lender to mark your rents market as well as applying a market vacancy to your project. Additionally, like portfolio lenders, CMBS lenders will be less aggressive in markets that have a greater percentage of defaulting CMBS loans.

James DuMars
Managing Director
NorthMarq Capital Phoenix Office

2929 East Camelback Road, Suite 226
Phoenix, AZ 85016

(602) 508-2206 Direct
(602) 714-4202 Cell
(602) 954-6168 Fax

jdumars@northmarq.com
www.northmarq.com

It seems like we enjoy clichés each cycle to try and generalize the norm. For example, if “extend and pretend” applies to banks and “amend to the end” applies to CMBS then “unwilling to bend” may be the next catch phrase to describe life companies when it comes to work-outs and maturity extensions.

Why the lack of flexibility? The lack of flexibility on behalf of some life companies could rest with their MEAF.

MEAF – Mortgage Experience Adjustment Factor
The purpose of MEAF is to help calculate the appropriate amount of capital an insurer should hold (think cash reserves) based on the composition of the insurer’s commercial mortgage portfolio (think portfolio performance).

How MEAF may influence a life company at extension time or at loan modification request: I’ve spoken to some my life company contacts about MEAF. They report that when it comes to MEAF their portfolios are measured against their peers (all other life companies) and even one or two defaults can have a negative impact on their standing against their peers resulting in an increase in their reserves. So consider the state of the commercial mortgage market. CMBS and banks are experiencing massive defaults but insurance companies, who as a whole were markedly less aggressive during the credit boom, have experienced far fewer defaults. However, since their mortgage experience (the insurance companies) is measured against their peers alone, a couple of work-outs/defaults can cause them to have to increase their Risk Based Capital significantly.

One insurer tells me they would rather foreclose and sell the asset versus restructuring it and have it negatively affect their MEAF until the loan pays off in a few years. With foreclosure they get rid of the loan, sell the property and the problem is solved. I’ve witnessed this firsthand with a number of borrowers whose loans matured in the past 12 months. One particular life company asked for a cash infusion and personal guaranty. When the borrower was unable to provide the necessary capital infusion the life company requested that a receiver be put in place and began foreclosure proceedings.

In another instance, a borrower had a Class-A multifamily loan maturing. The borrower was unable to secure a new loan to take out the life company and was reluctant to sell in the soft market. The life company sighted MEAF as a motivating factor to foreclose and resell the property versus modifying it and living with a negative mark against their portfolio performance during the duration the loan continued to be on their books. They made it clear that it affects their entire portfolio rating to have a problem loan. Once they rework the loan it hangs over them until it eventually pays off. Understand that a below normal MEAF can lead to increased reserves against an insurance company’s entire mortgage portfolio. Considering this, one can see the reluctance on behalf of the insurers to offer any extensions or modifications without right sizing the loan.

James DuMars

Managing Director

NorthMarq Capital Phoenix Office

(602) 508-2206 Direct

(602) 714-4202 Cell

 jdumars@northmarq.com

www.northmarq.com

© 2012 CPE Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Yardi  |   Point2  |   Multihousing News  |   Commercial Property Executive  |   RENTCafe  |   YES Energy Management  |   PropertyShark  |   RentGrow  |   Visual Homes  |   SiteStuff  |   Point2 Property Manager  |   ScreeningWorks  |   ResidentShield